Dublin,
Financial Times interactive data, FTID, evs, Dublin based
funds, information for funds, fund information, nav calculation,
evaluated securities, illiquid bond pricing, Best No-Load,
Best Performing, Bonds, Brokers, Closed End Funds, Day Trading
In Europe, Education, Equities, Equity, Equity Index Fund,
Exchange, Exchange Traded Funds, Exchange-Traded, Fidelity,
Financial Planning, Fund Rating, Fund Research, Hedge Funds,
Index Funds, Index Funds, Index Investing, Indexed, Indexing,
Insurance, Interest, Investing, Investing, Investing, Investment,
Investments, Janus Funds, London Stock Exchange, Markets,
Money, Morningstar Is A Good Site To Look At , Mutual Fund,
Mutual Funds, Mutualfunds, Mutuals, Nasdaq, Easdaq, Financial
News, financial times, Journal, editors, editor, Nikkei, No
Load Funds, No-Load Mutual Funds, Nyse, Personal Finances,
Quotes, Retirement, Savings, Schwab, Shares, Stock Market,
Stock Quotes, Stocks, Ticker, Top Mutual, Trade, Variable
Annuity fund, Wall Street,
WHY INVEST INTO MUTUAL
FUNDS?
PROFESSIONAL INVESTMENT EXPERTISE
For a reasonable cost, investors
will secure the services of a professional fund manager to manage the
fund. Most investors would concede that they are unlikely to be able
to outperform a professional over a reasonable period of time even if
they had the time to devote to the portfolio of securities.
Nevertheless, it is true that
in the short run at least, some fund managers do not always achieve
good fund performance and very few seem capable of consistently beating
their benchmark stock market index - the market "average"
weighted according to the market capitalisation (share price x number
of shares in issue) of the individual stocks. This latter point is dealt
with later when considering the types of fund available and their respective
merits. There are funds which actually seek to replicate the performance
of a given stock market index, thus effectively guaranteeing that such
a fund will not under-perform the market.
Unfortunately, the readily available
performance league tables which measure the percentage gains or losses
of funds with similar investment objectives do not always provide a
reliable guide as to which fund should be selected. There is evidence
to suggest that he who finishes "top of the pops" this year
will be unlikely to repeat the performance next year. Past performance
may not be indicative of the future. Nevertheless, it is probably best
to follow those who have been successful over say a five year period.
Any shorter period may be an unreliable guide, and a longer period may
disguise poor recent performance. Also, successful individual fund managers
given the responsibility for managing the portfolios of specific funds
by their employers, the fund management companies, tend to be head-hunted
and may move on to work for rival fund management companies.
None of this should detract from
the opening statement that a professional fund manager should be able
to outperform an amateur investor over a reasonable period of time.
Indeed, in this competitive market, individual fund managers who fail
to deliver tend to "disappear" very soon - the job may be
compared with that of a football manager!